Europe leaves companies alone - other countries take a more targeted approach
In Europe, particularly in accordance with the EU ATEX directives, simple tools such as hammers, pliers or screwdrivers may not be certified. Legislation assumes that companies themselves assess which tools are suitable for use in Ex zones. This responsibility therefore lies entirely with the operator.
In practice, this often leads to uncertainty:
- What is suitable?
- Which materials are permitted?
- Are there independent audits?
Other countries are already one step ahead.
🔎 Beispiel Indien: Zertifizierung für Ex-Werkzeuge
In India, there is an official certification process for tools that are used in potentially explosive atmospheres. These tools are tested and approved for their suitability by institutions such as the Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research (CIMFR).
The advantage:
Companies do not have to decide for themselves whether a tool is suitable. Instead, they can rely on a tested offer - with clear proof of suitability.
👇 Was Europa von solchen Modellen lernen kann
While the European solution is based on individual responsibility, countries like India offer their companies the following:
- Orientation through standards
- Security through external audits
- Legal certainty when purchasing
- Mehr Vertrauen in das verwendete Werkzeug
Smaller or non-specialized companies in particular would also benefit greatly from a similar model in this country.
📌 Fazit
There is no ATEX certification for tools in the EU - but there are countries that have long since gone one step further. With its certification model, India shows how safety, clarity and reliability can be created in a sensitive area.
Perhaps it is time to consider such a model in Europe too - so that explosion protection is no longer the sole responsibility of the operator.